2nd Nov 2017
1. PURPOSE
An issue was raised with the AEPDP Technical Advisory Group (TAG) in relation to the use of ”Indicator Not Assessed” or ”INA” in EPDs. The EPD in question had used INA for indicators in the ”Use of resources” section of the EPD. The purpose of this guidance is to communicate the findings of the TAG discussions of the use of INA in EPDs.
2. FINDINGS OF THE TAG
Based on discussions with TAG members we have come to a consensus that:
In conclusion, all indicators shall be reported for mandatory modules (A1-A3) and should be reported for non-mandatory modules where they are included. Where the parameters for non- mandatory modules can’t be reported, due to no data being available, then INA may be used, however, sufficient justification shall be given.
3. FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information and background please refer to the following standards and guidance material:
4. TREATMENT OF EXISTING PUBLISHED EPDS
Some EPDs that have already been published do not currently follow this guidance. It is expected that existing published EPDs are updated to comply with this guidance as part of their regular surveillance verifications, or when the EPD is changed/updated.
Early adopter says EPDs may change the narrative on pulp & paper industry Oji Fibre Solutions (OjiFS) is one of Australasia’s leading manufacturers...
It’s been a quarter of a century since the world’s first EPD was published. The first EPD was published in 1998 by the...
The pre-Christmas rush saw the publication of nine new EPDs by Australian and New Zealand businesses and updates of four EPDs. We welcome...