2nd Nov 2017
1. PURPOSE
An issue was raised with the AEPDP Technical Advisory Group (TAG) in relation to the use of ”Indicator Not Assessed” or ”INA” in EPDs. The EPD in question had used INA for indicators in the ”Use of resources” section of the EPD. The purpose of this guidance is to communicate the findings of the TAG discussions of the use of INA in EPDs.
2. FINDINGS OF THE TAG
Based on discussions with TAG members we have come to a consensus that:
In conclusion, all indicators shall be reported for mandatory modules (A1-A3) and should be reported for non-mandatory modules where they are included. Where the parameters for non- mandatory modules can’t be reported, due to no data being available, then INA may be used, however, sufficient justification shall be given.
3. FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information and background please refer to the following standards and guidance material:
4. TREATMENT OF EXISTING PUBLISHED EPDS
Some EPDs that have already been published do not currently follow this guidance. It is expected that existing published EPDs are updated to comply with this guidance as part of their regular surveillance verifications, or when the EPD is changed/updated.
EPD Australasia has reached a major milestone with the publication of the 2,000th Environmental Product Declaration, reflecting the continued growth in demand for...
Massive growth from Dec 2024 to Apr 2025, with sixteen businesses joining the programme and over one thousand new EPDs published. EPD Australasia...
The EPD Australasia logo has been refreshed and is now available for download and use on EPDs. In common with the...