2nd Nov 2017
1. PURPOSE
An issue was raised with the AEPDP Technical Advisory Group (TAG) in relation to the use of ”Indicator Not Assessed” or ”INA” in EPDs. The EPD in question had used INA for indicators in the ”Use of resources” section of the EPD. The purpose of this guidance is to communicate the findings of the TAG discussions of the use of INA in EPDs.
2. FINDINGS OF THE TAG
Based on discussions with TAG members we have come to a consensus that:
In conclusion, all indicators shall be reported for mandatory modules (A1-A3) and should be reported for non-mandatory modules where they are included. Where the parameters for non- mandatory modules can’t be reported, due to no data being available, then INA may be used, however, sufficient justification shall be given.
3. FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information and background please refer to the following standards and guidance material:
4. TREATMENT OF EXISTING PUBLISHED EPDS
Some EPDs that have already been published do not currently follow this guidance. It is expected that existing published EPDs are updated to comply with this guidance as part of their regular surveillance verifications, or when the EPD is changed/updated.
EPD Australasia is pleased to announce the appointment of Barbara Nebel to our Board of Directors. Barbara is the CEO of thinkstep-anz –...
This week, EPD Australasia celebrates a milestone: our 10th birthday! Launched on 2 September 2014 by the Life Cycle Association of New Zealand...
This year, EPD Australasia has continued our strong growth in the publication of Environmental Product Declarations, with over 100 new and 18 updated...